Yes it does work and I have done it only once through the power of crystals

Telepathy is supposed communication between two persons without recourse to the senses. The word was formulated in 1882 by Frederic William Henry Myers, English poet, essayist, and a leading founder of the Society for Psychical Research in London. Telepathy experiments have been conducted in Europe, the Soviet Union, and the United States, but the phenomenon remains unproved.

No one seems ot know how it works though!

Because current science has no plausible explanation for claims of telepathic phenomena, “telepathy” resides in the realm of metaphysics, and cannot itself technically be called a theory of telepathy, since the varied explanations have various unbridgeable gaps to current science. The term “extrasensory communication” has had some use for describing telepathy, as using senses other than the 5 basic human senses (though, that a “sense” may itself have no organ for its sensing cause some to dismiss it).

However, because human observation of “strange currencies” and similar extraordinary phenomena have long endured, similar or related explanations have resonance in contemporary history, fiction, and belief. The concept of telepathy has been connected to a number of different similar metaphysical phenomena such as precognition, clairvoyance and empathy, and has some important bearing within religious concepts of connectivity between human beings (love, bonding) and related ritual development.

Much of formal religious discourse since the inception of civilization has dealt with the apparent disparity between religious truth (which may refer to the “truth” of “extrasensory” communication) and emerging human rationality and empirical-based belief. Nearly all religions (almost by definition) embody aspects of metaphysicality within their spheres of understanding, and some argue that the consistent threads between these apparent and “witnessed” metaphysical events and experiences have a plausible (though not scientific) explanation in the idea of telepathic communication; both between individuals, and even between larger collective groups. For example, the aspect of human ethnicity, as having an apparent bearing on the development of a “collective psyche,” which itself has bearing in defining an enemy, or otherwise “understood” divisions within and between societies.

Proponents of telepathy argue that the difficulty in rationalizing or “proving” the concept is equivalent to the difficulty in bringing dreams to conscious awareness; human beings are finite creatures living within temporal, physical, and psychic mediums. I.e., “just as a fish may be unaware of the importance of water to their being, so too do humans and other animals exist in a psychic medium which many are not consciously aware of.”

Proponents of the telepathy theory claim that empirical observation points to an unexplainable connection between all animal species, that it accounts for a great number of yet-unexplainable phenomena, such as how various kinds of animals and insects are able to function as part of a collective whole. To some degree, they claim, this psychic connection is not limited by culture or species, but by the sensor’s own ability to relate to and perceive the “signals” they may be receiving.

When Carl Jung posed his theory of the collective unconscious, it symbolized an emerging rift between his theories and those of his colleague Sigmund Freud, who had instead chosen to reject metaphysical explanations, opting for more “rational” explanations for apparently unexplainable phenomena. To this day, the terms “psyche” and “psychic” have dual use in both the science of psychology and in metaphysics, depending on whether the discussion may provide for the possibility (either declared or implied) of explanations and ideas outside of current science.

Perhaps the most interesting contemporary developments lie in those explanations which attempt to tie naturally developed aspects of human sensitivity (by some accessible medium) to the realm of current theoretical quantum physics, which has radically changed the formal understanding (classical physics) about the nature of time and space, energy and matter, and the relationships between each. The most evolved concepts of telepathy draw from both ideas in psychology and physics: That any mind can be conceived of as a naturally-formed matrix of electrical signals grown and suspended within a physical scaffold, and that all similar minds have evolved similar capabilities for influencing and receiving fluctuations at the quantum levels, where the normal laws of time and space do not apply. They further claim that psychological concepts of personal and collective identity, sanity, boundaries, self, emotions etc. all are as much (if not more so) aspects of a “psychic medium” as they of the physical structure (brain). In essence, proponents claim that telepathy is not “extrasensory”, rather that the brain is the telepathic organ; its connections to other brains are not physical, but psychic, and the very definition of the psychic medium is the localized inertial frame of reference which is affected by the mind. This new and scientifically grounded approach provides the context for the amateur theory of neurokinetic telepathy. Physicists and skeptics counter that quantum mechanics does not take dominance over classical mechanics until objects are at sub-nanometer scales, and since neurons and even neurotransmitters and receptors are all much larger, these quantum effects are considered negligible.

Read more at =&fw=3&fc=3&ss=-1&es=-1&gwp=11&ver=1.0.8.207&method=1

it’s when people can communicate using only thoughts. It doesn’t really happen, it’s not scientifically possible.

However, many people believe this is what happen when they share thoughts. when you have a lot in common with someone and spend a lot of time with them, you tend to start thinking the same way, your thoughts are based on what’s going on around you, so if you are with someone a lot, your brain may start working the same way and jumping to some of the same conclusions. this has happened to me before with people i was close to at one time or another.

“Telepathy, from the Greek τηλε, tele, “distant”, and πάθεια, patheia, “feeling”, is the claimed innate ability of humans and other creatures to communicate information from one mind to another, without the use of extra tools such as speech or body language. Considered a form of extra-sensory perception or anomalous cognition, telepathy is often connected to various paranormal phenomena such as precognition, clairvoyance and empathy.

Though many scientific experiments into telepathy have been conducted, including recent ones by respected universities (some claiming significant positive results), telepathy remains controversial and is not widely accepted by scientists.”

telepathy, supposed communication between two persons without recourse to the senses. The word was formulated in 1882 by Frederic William Henry Myers, English poet, essayist, and a leading founder of the Society for Psychical Research in London. Telepathy experiments have been conducted in Europe, the Soviet Union, and the United States, but the phenomenon remains unproved.

Communication through means other than the senses, as by the exercise of an occult power.

For much more please check the webpage

Telepathy generally means communicating information / ideas / news /facts etc. in one ind directly to other person’s mind, no matter how far he or she is. It is not seen practically possible be me, but still have some observations i.e. sometimes you get worried about some person without any reasons or expect some to come or call you and when you came in contact with him / her . They endorses your thinking true.

I believe it is when one person thinks something and another can tell you what they are thinking without the first person saying anything . I do it with my hubby all the time…. it is scary.

Yes, thoughts that are really loud come across clearer. Try screaming something at him without actually using words or sounds. Make it a simple sentence and practice. You can also try sending each other images, like a slice of pizza. It really boils down to actively practicing. When two people hang out with each other a lot, it makes it easier to communicate between each other but often times one person is the sender and one is the receiver. It takes practice to be both at the same time in order to carry on a conversation. But practicing it would be fun.

Yes, this is a well-documented and scientifically demonstrated phenomenon.

For example, is the site of a pioneer in dream telepathy experiments.
is run by Stanford Univ.-related professionals, with links to well-run dream telepathy experiments.

Looking up studies, duplicated at several universities, beginning with the Grinberg-Zylberbaum team in 1993, the Sabell team in 2001, the Wackermann group in 2003, and the Standish team in 2004, further refines how telepathy occurs. (It is worth noting that dogmatic nay-saying is typically illogical, and uninformed as to the high level of professional design in such research.) These experiments have in common use of Faraday cages (to screen out EMF energies), double-masking protocols including for evaluation, and high correlations using brain scan technology. One protocol: pair two people who “meditate together,” use other pairs as controls (no joint meditation, etc.). Then, separate the pair, in cages (different rooms, of course), expose one to a specific and unique stimuli (e.g., certain patterns of visual, e.g. light sequences), note eegs for all individuals at that time, and the patterns of cortical activity in the control groups are not correlated, whereas the patterns of the two who shared meditation together record highly correlated brain patterns specific to that unique and sole-individual stimulus. This indicates that individuals who feel and enjoy and think alike are able to influence and communicate with each other within a nonlocal, non-EMF mode.
has examples of “telephone telepathy” experiments, in which random and friend callers were induced to call the subjects, with significant “guessing” prior to conversation, by the subjects, of who was calling, etc.

So the question is relatively resolved, in favor of some nonlocal, non-EMF similar-feeling/thinking connection sense, termed “telepathy.”

It is well to note that there is a continuum at work: some coincidings are more telepathic, some may be more shared environmental stimuli, etc., and confidence gained as one notes genuine, rather unique and convincing shared telepathy may strengthen and develop further the quality.

Some resources:

“A Secret History of Consciousness,” Gary Lachman,
“The Big Book of the Soul,” Ian Lawton,
“God Is Not Dead,” Amit Goswami, Ph.D.,
“Entangled Minds,’ Dr. Dean Radin (full urls deleted due to Yahoo! limit of 10 live)
“Into the Light,” John Lerma, M.D.
“Man’s Psychic Structures,” O. M. Aivanhov,
“The Path of the Higher Self,” Mark Prophet,
“Ethical ESP,” Ann Ree Colton,

No